Head-to-head
Expandi vs Heyreach
Heyreach is our stronger pick on aggregate; Expandi still wins for specific personas.
7.6
/ 10
Pricing
8.2
/ 10
7.6
/ 10
Deliverability
8.2
/ 10
7.6
/ 10
Integrations
8.2
/ 10
7.6
/ 10
Use-case fit
8.2
/ 10
Pick Expandi when
- →Operators who specifically distrust the 'cloud-based runs-your-LinkedIn-account-from-our-infrastructure' model and want browser-based tooling.
- →Single-account operators where Heyreach's multi-account advantages aren't relevant.
- →Teams that have been running Expandi for 2+ years and have established workflows they don't want to migrate.
- →Buyers who prioritize per-account control over agency-style multi-tenant management.
Pick Heyreach when
- →Agencies running LinkedIn outreach across 3+ client accounts. The native multi-tenant architecture eliminates the workspace-juggling other tools require.
- →Teams that have been throttled, restricted, or banned by LinkedIn for over-aggressive automation and want pacing logic that respects LinkedIn's actual rate limits.
- →Sales teams running multichannel sequences where LinkedIn is one channel — Heyreach's API and integration story are cleaner than the 'browser extension' competitors.
- →Operators who care about a clean unified inbox view across multiple LinkedIn accounts.
- →Entry pricing matters — $79 vs $99
Expandi
from $99/mo
Heyreach
from $79/mo
Side-by-side data
Sort by:
Comparison updates
We re-run the head-to-heads quarterly. Subscribe and we'll send the new verdicts when the data shifts.