Stack overlap
Apollo vs Heyreach
Apollo is a lead databases tool; Heyreach is a linkedin outreach tool. They solve different problems — most stacks include both. This page answers whether you need them both and how they overlap.
Apollo is in our lead databases category; Heyreach is in our linkedin outreach category. The scorecard below compares them on the four axes we apply to every tool, but the underlying jobs differ — read the scoring as “how each performs at its own job” rather than “which one wins.”
8.3
/ 10
Pricing
8.2
/ 10
8.3
/ 10
Deliverability
8.2
/ 10
8.3
/ 10
Integrations
8.2
/ 10
8.3
/ 10
Use-case fit
8.2
/ 10
Pick Apollo when
- →You're an SMB or growth-stage sales team that needs lead data + basic engagement on one bill, not five.
- →Your ICP is US tech / SaaS where Apollo's data quality is strongest.
- →You want a free tier to test before committing — Apollo's free plan is actually usable for sub-100 lookups/month.
- →You'd rather have 'good enough' across 4 functions than 'great' at 1 — Apollo's bundle math beats buying ZoomInfo + Outreach + Salesloft separately for SMB volume.
- →Entry pricing matters — $59 vs $79
Pick Heyreach when
- →Agencies running LinkedIn outreach across 3+ client accounts. The native multi-tenant architecture eliminates the workspace-juggling other tools require.
- →Teams that have been throttled, restricted, or banned by LinkedIn for over-aggressive automation and want pacing logic that respects LinkedIn's actual rate limits.
- →Sales teams running multichannel sequences where LinkedIn is one channel — Heyreach's API and integration story are cleaner than the 'browser extension' competitors.
- →Operators who care about a clean unified inbox view across multiple LinkedIn accounts.
Apollo
from $59/mo
Heyreach
from $79/mo
Side-by-side data
Sort by:
Comparison updates
We re-run the head-to-heads quarterly. Subscribe and we'll send the new verdicts when the data shifts.