Head-to-head
Close vs Pipedrive
Close and Pipedrive score within 0.3 of each other on our rubric — the decision comes down to persona fit.
8.0
/ 10
Pricing
8.2
/ 10
8.0
/ 10
Deliverability
8.2
/ 10
8.0
/ 10
Integrations
8.2
/ 10
8.0
/ 10
Use-case fit
8.2
/ 10
Pick Close when
- →Inside-sales teams running phone-heavy outbound where built-in dialer + power dialer matters operationally.
- →Sales-led organizations that want CRM + dialer + email sequencer + SMS in one tool to avoid integration friction.
- →Companies replacing a Pipedrive + Aircall + Outreach stack with a single platform.
- →Buyers who already use Close and have built operational workflows around it.
Pick Pipedrive when
- →SMB sales teams (5-30 people) that want a sales-focused CRM without the marketing/service hub overhead HubSpot bundles.
- →Pipeline-stage-managed sales motions where visual deal flow is the operational backbone.
- →Buyers prioritizing per-seat cost discipline — $14/seat at Essential beats HubSpot Sales Hub's $50/seat structure.
- →Teams that want a CRM their reps will actually use — Pipedrive's UI scores high on rep adoption in our category research.
- →Entry pricing matters — $14 vs $49
Close
from $49/mo
Pipedrive
from $14/mo
Side-by-side data
Sort by:
Comparison updates
We re-run the head-to-heads quarterly. Subscribe and we'll send the new verdicts when the data shifts.